Saturday July 31, 2010

subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!


  • City & Region

    Judge throws out drug charges after ‘bad faith’ RCMP search

    A wacky tip about someone tied up in a house wasn’t good enough reason for police to search a property without a warrant, a B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled.

    The federal Crown stayed marijuana charges against Karen Brunskil and Steven Leahy after Justice John Truscott said police violated their rights when they searched their property April 26, 2009.

    The RCMP were investigating an anonymous second-hand report, received by phone, suggesting someone was tied up at a house. Two officers arrived at Leahy and Brunskill’s home, located in a rural area near 100 Mile House, and said they needed to look around.

    The couple allowed the police to look inside their house, but balked when police said they wanted to search the outbuildings as well. Growing marijuana was found inside three locked sheds behind the house. Officers forced their way inside the sheds.

    Justice Truscott said the officers had no objective reason to think anything amiss was afoot. The initial anonymous call to the RCMP was bizarre and contained little rational information suggesting someone was in danger.

    The couple’s behaviour at the head of their driveway after police arrived was not unusual. They had no criminal records and police had no information to suggest the house was producing drugs.

    “In my view, when the two constables went to the address and spoke to the accused at the front gate and were told that there was no one tied up at that residence, they should have accepted that and left,” Justice Truscott said.

    “I recognize that from the police perspective it is always considered risky to ignore a complaint, but there must be some common sense exercised before intruding on a person's home.

    “It is actually quite alarming that the police should have considered that they had the right to carry out a warrantless search on the basis of such a telephone call. I consider, in all the circumstances, the police acted in bad faith in carrying out this search when it was clearly an unreasonable suspicion,” the judge said.

    The trial was held in January. Truscott’s written decision in the case was publicly released Wednesday.


    [Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
    Copyright 2010 Glacier Media Inc.

    Comments

    0
    0

    menthelius says...

    If you are going to tell people what is right and wrong, than you better make sure that what you're doing is right! I hate hypocrites.

    Posted on February 12, 2010 @ 9:06 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3259814 

    0
    0

    menthelius says...

    I know a few cops, they are people like everyone else, but seem to attract more than a few of the type that are "unbalanced". Not to disrespect anyone who does not fit that category, but cops really need to clean up their organization as a whole.

    After my Dad retired some years back I believe he said it best when commenting to me, "You know these cops are NOT the police I was taught to respect when I was growing up." - that from a man who followed the law every day of his life, helped out in his community, and still is a good person.

    Too many abuses in the cops' ranks these days, I find it hard to trust people that would sooner bust some harmless creep than go after the pedophiles and murderers.

    Posted on February 12, 2010 @ 9:05 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3259812 

    0
    0

    lrem22 says...

    To serve and protect. Coming from a long line of member and a few with distinction I agree with Grouchy. Better safe than sorry and in today's world one can never be to sure of what they would find. And like Grouchy, at least now one more grow op is down and I doubt they will try it again.

    Posted on February 12, 2010 @ 7:42 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3259791 

    0
    0

    menthelius says...

    Yes they were breaking the law. How were the cops' actions any different? I recall someone saying on another post that due to the Charter we are all much safer from illegal cop actions, I guess this proves that fallacy (again). Remember the cops are not your friends! Cops have a job to do and God help you if you get in the way, shoot first and ask questions later!

    Posted on February 12, 2010 @ 7:26 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3259788 

    0
    0

    Grouchy says...

    While I agree in principal with the ruling, what if there was something going on at this house ? What would we be saying about the RCMP then ? I think that they tried to err on the side of caution just in case. At least now this grow op is done for.

    Posted on February 12, 2010 @ 6:30 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3259780 

    Post a comment

    You must be Registered and logged in to post a comment.

    Register or

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.




    About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Interactive Media: Information and Other Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2009 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?