Tuesday September 07, 2010

subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!

  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    • Who is your favourite B.C. politician right now?
    • Gordon Campbell
    • 10%
    • Carole James
    • 56%
    • Bill Vander Zalm
    • 34%
    • Total Votes: 2121



    City & Region

    Parole board denies parole to woman who burned son and daughter

    License
    Share |

    A Kamloops woman who set her two young children on fire, killing her daughter, continues to deny she set the blaze.

    A parole board refused Donna Hysop’s request for day parole, saying she would pose too great a risk to the community if she were released from jail now, even for short periods.

    Hysop, 42, was charged with second-degree murder in 1997, convicted by a jury in 1998 and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 10 years. She appealed her conviction unsuccessfully. Canada's Supreme Court refused to hear her case.

    She was arrested after emergency officials responded to a 911 call placed by Hysop from her Juniper Ridge townhouse. When firefighters arrived, they found her five-year-old daughter Alicia and her three-year-old son Joshua horribly burned.

    Alicia later died in hospital. Joshua now lives with his father in a different community.

    The Crown said Hysop doused her children with a flammable solvent and set them on fire. At her trial, Hysop said she did not set her children on fire, but claimed the two accidentally torched themselves.

    Hysop testified several apparent confessions she made were taken out of context, that her words — heard by officers, nurses, neighbours and ambulance attendants — were misunderstood.

    A parole board report, prepared the day of her Feb. 25 hearing, reveals Hysop’s story hasn’t changed.

    “You provided a brief emotional account of the day of the fire that was consistent with the file information, in other words, you denied the offence and stated you do not know how the fire got started,” the parole board wrote.

    “You also denied file information which indicates you are seen as suffering from distress at times to the point of self-harm and/or suicide attempts. You indicate you have never tried to kill yourself.

    “You feel you have again been misunderstood.”

    Hysop hoped to be released from jail occasionally in order to visit her parents. She also wants to move to a community residential facility somewhere in the Interior and be granted day parole.

    The parole board denied both requests, saying the woman requires a “level of intervention” that cannot be managed in the community.

    “Your case management team notes that despite counselling and programs, you fail to take responsibility for your offences,” a factor that increases your risk to offend again.

    rkoopmans@kamloopsnews.ca


    [Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
    Copyright 2010 Glacier Media Inc.

    License
    Share |

    Comments

    Sort Comments:


    0
    0

    Trudi says...

    To Irem22
    Evidence of mental health issues were not mentioned at trial because Donna did not want them part of the trial. The judge wanted assurance by the defense lawyer that an insanity plea would not ever become a defense before he proceeded with the trial.

    Even after evidence of attempted suicide were proven, she still won't admit to them.

    She is still in denial. After her husband, Gregory Bonderud, divorced her, I thought she might own up but apparently not. And I agree with Grouchy who say the parole board is starting to show some long needed common sense. I cannot imagine what horror this woman might wreak on unsuspecting people should she be released.

    Posted on April 2, 2010 @ 1:02 pm PST | Report post to Editor | 3616723 

    0
    0

    lrem22 says...

    Menthelius,
    According to, Donna Elizabeth Hysop v. Supreme Court of British Columbia, November 26, 1998.

    No evidence of mental health issues were mentioned at trial. However, an appeal was filed as the convicted was questioned in hospital while recovering from injuries incurred during the fire.
    This evidence was then given in court. The appeal was denied.

    Posted on March 16, 2010 @ 11:16 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3481246 

    0
    0

    menthelius says...

    Maybe she also has a history of mental problems?

    I'm surprised at your lack of compassion "irem22", when someone else said Allan Schoenborn should be killed you accused him of being "the grandson of Hitler"!

    You are a funny lady!

    Posted on March 16, 2010 @ 9:52 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3481219 

    0
    0

    Grouchy says...

    The Parole Board is starting to show some long needed common sense. This woman sounds like a real whack job.

    Posted on March 16, 2010 @ 8:53 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3481194 

    0
    0

    lrem22 says...

    Whether intentional or not it is her fault. If she did in fact commit such a horrible crime, then she should never be granted parole. If it is as she claims, and I doubt that, then she was negligent by leaving flammable material around and accesible to small children and a toddler.

    Posted on March 16, 2010 @ 6:56 am PST | Report post to Editor | 3481178 

    Post a comment

    You must be Registered and logged in to post a comment.

    Register or

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.




    About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Interactive Media: Information and Other Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2009 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?