Thursday May 23, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    Proposal sets stage for scrap over tax 'windfall'

    Cherry picking — that’s what TNRD director John Sternig calls a potential tax grab if the City of Kamloops were to gobble up Ajax mine.

    Under its current proposed configuration, the mine’s 2,500-hectare expanse is shared between an unincorporated area in the Thompson-Nicola Regional District and the City of Kamloops.

    B.C.’s history shows a pattern of municipalities expanding their boundaries to include major industrial properties.

    A nearby example is Highland Valley Copper, included two decades ago into the District Municipality of Logan Lake, which is more than 10 kilometres away.

    That inclusion costs the municipality almost nothing, because it provides no services to the mine itself. But in return it rakes in about $1.8 million a year — equal to one-third of its total revenues.

    That number fluctuates based on the assessed value of the mine’s assets.

    Mark Freberg, community affairs director for Highland Valley Copper, said the greatest benefit to the mine from its tax payable to the municipality is quality of life in Logan Lake.

    “A more attractive community helps us attract workers.”

    But Sternig, an outspoken director on the TNRD, said any boundary expansion windfall for the City of Kamloops shouldn’t come at the expense of rural taxpayers.

    “Ajax straddles the border… . We shouldn’t lose. The provincial government should ensure we’re fully compensated for what we lose and our taxpayers are not abused.”

    Pat Wallace, a longtime director on the TNRD board and a Kamloops City councillor, said she needs many questions answered about mine impacts before she thinks about a tax windfall.

    But she added, if it goes ahead, the mine could also pay royalties to either or both of the regional district and City.

    “That to me would be an option… but I need a lot more information as to the pros and cons on its impacts to the City.”

    Those impacts, beyond environmental, could include impacts on City roads from haul trucks as well as other infrastructure that could result in expenditures.

    Sternig agreed the tax windfall for the City would be much greater than for the TNRD, but he doesn’t want rural taxpayers to lose out.

    “They have the tools (in tax law) to create a windfall, whether that’s fair or not.”

    cfortems@kamloopsnews.ca


    [Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
    Copyright 2013 Glacier Media Inc.

    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?