Tuesday May 21, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    Defence lawyers quit jail-sex case

    Without legal defence funding from RCMP, case in 'holding pattern'

    Three police officers facing charges over a jailhouse sex-viewing incident have been denied legal defence funding by the RCMP commissioner in Ottawa.

    The denial of funding leaves the officers without legal counsel — all three defence lawyers who were retained have withdrawn their services — a setback that had Judge Chris Cleaveley reluctantly agreeing Tuesday to adjourn a pre-trial conference on the case.

    Cpl. Kenneth Brown, Const. Evan Elgee and Const. Stephen Zaharia, along with civilian jail guard David Tompkins, face one count each of breach of trust as a result of the August 2010 incident at the city detachment. Two women in custody, who did not know one another, had sex in an RCMP cell, which was witnessed by the four accused via video.

    Crown prosecutor Winston Sayson, who addressed the court by phone from Vancouver on Tuesday, said refusal of funding is another setback for a case already delayed. No explanation for the decision was offered in court.

    RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson is the only one with authority to approve or deny defence funding for members.

    "This kind of puts us in a holding pattern until we find someone," Sayson said. "This means they're waiving their right to a trial within a reasonable time."

    Julian Van Der Walle, a Salmon Arm lawyer representing Tompkins, took no position on the adjournment.

    The judge was concerned that the delay might mean a preliminary inquiry would also have to be postponed. The trial is expected to begin in September.

    "It's obvious the relationship between defence counsel and the accused has broken down," Cleaveley said. "It's my view they all need to be represented by counsel for an effective presentation and arguments at the preliminary inquiry."

    The matter was adjourned until a pre-trial conference set for Aug. 23. That stage of the proceedings is expected to last two weeks and involve about 15 witnesses testifying on behalf of the Crown.

    The case has so far encountered a succession of hurdles.

    Lawyers who were representing the officers applied for a publication ban on the preliminary hearing in early June. They abandoned that after The Daily News objected. When they next gathered on June 15, the lawyers refused to sign a promise to keep the jailhouse video strictly private.


    [Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
    Copyright 2013 Glacier Media Inc.

    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?