Wednesday May 22, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    First Nations court requires right judges

    There is no guarantee a First Nations courtroom set to launch in Kamloops in the new year will be the success some hope it will be. A number of factors will determine whether the court will offer more meaningful resolutions for First Nations offenders than are found in traditional approaches to justice, including — and perhaps most importantly — the character and conduct of the presiding judge.

    The Kamloops First Nations court will model itself after the New Westminster First Nations courtroom, which has been in operation since 2006. It sits monthly and hears bail hearings, sentencings and child-protection cases involving aboriginal offenders or parties.

    The court there offers alternatives to traditional adversarial justice and is available to self-identified aboriginals.

    It focusses on creating a sense of community and ensures all who want a chance to speak are heard.

    The courtroom in New Westminster is the domain of provincial court judge Marion Buller-Bennett, who is herself aboriginal and B.C.’s only female First Nations judge. In fact, the very idea of a dedicated courtroom for aboriginal offenders was hers.

    At hearings, Judge Buller-Bennett works co-operatively with everyone at the table to come up with an appropriate “healing plan.” There is no doubt her guidance and leadership are key reasons why the idea of a First Nations court now grows.

    In Kamloops, the First Nations court will be presided over by judges Chris Cleaveley and Stella Frame. Both are experienced and knowledgable but time will tell if they have the right personalities and willingness to preside in a meaningful way over the unique kind of forum the First Nations court will no doubt prove to be.

    The idea of a First Nations court is valuable. Canada imprisons too many aboriginal offenders and does not do enough to recognize distinct cultural factors that keep too many on the wrong path.

    Judges Cleaveley and Frame have the opportunity to make a difference and contribute to the recognition there is room for better ways of dispensing justice. In large part, the success of the Kamloops First Nations court rests with them.


    We Say editorials represent the viewpoint of The Daily News and are written by editor Robert Koopmans, city editor Tracy Gilchrist, news editor Mike Cornell or associate news editors Dan Spark and Mark Rogers.

    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?