Friday May 24, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    Response shows 'slippery nature of truth'

    Join the debate — click here to submit your letter to the editor.

    A week or so ago, I pointed out several examples of major problems with the B.C. Liberals’ fiscal record through their term of office.

    It elicited a spirited, if not fully accurate, defence from K. Wells, who chose to go on the offensive and attack the NDP record of the 1990s (NDP Had Bad Moments Too, The Daily News, Jan. 5). Unfortunately, the response was characterized by misrepresentation and half-truths.

    For example, Wells claims that B.C.’s unemployment rate during the 1990s, when the NDP was last in office, was 15 per cent.

    The truth is that the province’s unemployment rate came down steadily over this period, from a high of 10.2 per cent in 1992 to a low of 7.2 per cent in 2000.

    Continuing in the truth-bending manner of many Liberal apologists, Wells also blamed undefined NDP policies for an exodus of rural doctors 15 years ago. As studies have shown, the issue of attracting and retaining rural medical professionals is far more complex than playing a simple, partisan blame game.

    Health care in the rural hinterland, including availability of doctors, continues to be a major concern after 12 years of B.C. Liberal government. In fact, the B.C. Medical Association currently estimates that 150,000 British Columbians cannot find a family doctor, up from 100,000 in 2000, including, as Wells must know, many Kamloops residents.

    Grudgingly, admitting that the HST debacle was not the B.C. Liberal party’s “brightest moment,” Wells’ letter provides support for Daily News editor Robert Koopmans’ recent musing about the slippery nature of truth.

    It shoehorns facts to fit a blatantly partisan agenda. While happy to dredge up half-truths about the NDP’s term in office, he neglects to mention much worse conduct associated with the B.C. Liberals.

    For example, the ongoing Liberal legerdemain over the B.C. Rail affair and its subsequent coverup completely escapes Wells’ attention.

    Too bad because that particular “gate” is still wide open. In that regard, I would suggest to K. Wells that it’s not Glen, it’s the other Clark, who has a lot more to worry about in May 2013.

    PETER NORTHCOTT

    Kamloops


    Join the debate — click here to submit your letter to the editor.

    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?