Tuesday May 21, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    Random breath testing valid enforcement technique

    Join the debate — click here to submit your letter to the editor.

    Regarding Random Breath Testing Intrusive (The Daily News, Jan. 14). Random breath testing has been introduced in numerous comparable democracies around the world without transforming any of them into police states.  

    Why would Canada be any different? What random breath testing has done in countries such as Australia, New Zealand and Ireland is help them significantly reduce their rates of impaired driving crashes and deaths.

    Millions of Canadians continue to drink and drive, in part because the likelihood of ever being stopped or charged is low. Survey, charge and conviction data indicate a person would have to drive impaired once a week, every week, for more than three years before being charged and for over six years before being convicted.

    Allowing police to demand breath samples from all drivers pulled over at checkpoints will greatly increase the deterrent value of the law. Random breath testing does not replace existing checkstops; it is used in conjunction with them.

    Furthermore, the cost of random breath testing will be largely offset by the savings achieved through reduced crashes. Fewer police resources will be spent on investigating and processing crashes, and can be redirected to deterring impaired driving.

    Your comparison with searches of trunks and basements is inaccurate. A more apt comparison would be with the existing random searches that occur now at airports, borders or entrances to courtrooms or many other government buildings.

    Such searches and seizures are allowed in order to ensure public safety. Legal experts have indicated that random breath testing will be found to be equally justified and constitutional.

    The protection of personal freedoms is important; so too is protecting citizens from needless and entirely preventable impaired driving crashes.

    Random breath testing has the potential to save hundreds of lives and prevent thousands of injuries every year.

    That is certainly worth a few minutes of drivers’ time.

    We are happy to share more information about random breath testing and the effect it would have in Canada via our web site at www.madd.ca

    ANDREW MURIE

    CEO, MADD Canada


    Join the debate — click here to submit your letter to the editor.

    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?