Monday May 20, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    No right to strip search suspect, lawyer argues

    Woman charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking

    Police had no right to strip search a suspected drug dealer before the woman had a chance to talk to her lawyer, a defence lawyer argued Tuesday.

    Tammy Van Buskirk, 40, is charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking.

    Crown prosecutor Anthony Varesi said RCMP’s drug squad set out in May 2011 to make arrests in a suspected dial-a-dope operation.

    Const. Brian Lamb testified he posed as a buyer and phoned Van Buskirk from the RCMP station to set up a fake cocaine deal.

    Van Buskirk was reluctant at first to do a drug deal because she didn’t know him, he said. At one point she asked the undercover Mountie, “’How do I know you’re not a cop?’” Lamb testified.

    After six phone calls Lamb said she finally agreed to sell him “a forty” — .40 grams of crack cocaine typically worth about $40. Lamb arranged to meet the seller near Memorial Arena.

    When Van Buskirk rolled up in the passenger side of a pickup, Lamb testified he told her, “Hey, forty?’”

    She replied “Yeah.” Lamb then gave a signal to a four-member cover team to move in for the arrest.

    But the Mounties didn’t find drugs on any of the three people in the truck. A female RCMP member eventually strip searched Van Buskirk, finding a ziplock baggie with less than .3 grams of cocaine on the jail cell floor.

    Defence lawyer Kevin Walker argued Van Buskirk’s rights were violated when she was searched prior to speaking with a lawyer. He said RCMP didn’t have enough grounds to conduct a strip search.

    “Strip searches are humiliating,” he told Justice Ian Meiklem. “They’re an invasion of privacy not needed for suspicions.”

    But Meiklem allowed the evidence, saying: “The reasonable and probable grounds for arrest were strong ones.”

    Meiklem also said it was not unreasonable for police to strip search Van Buskirk before she was able to speak with a lawyer.

    Another RCMP member testified the cell phone found in the truck rang twice with suspected customers on the line after Van Buskirk was arrested.

    Lawyers are expected to make final arguments Wednesday morning. Van Buskirk is scheduled for a second trial also beginning Wednesday on a related charge.


    [Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
    Copyright 2013 Glacier Media Inc.

    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?