Saturday May 25, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    Harper says he'll vote against private member's bill on human definition


    Prime Minister Stephen Harper tours a company with MP Stephen Woodworth in Waterloo, Ontario, March 11, 2011. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Geoff Robins

    OTTAWA - Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Thursday he'll vote against a motion introduced by one of his MPs that has reignited the national abortion debate.

    The Opposition and pro-choice advocates said Harper himself was inciting a new round of public battles over abortion by allowing debate on Tory MP Stephen Woodworth's motion.

    While Harper said he would personally reject the motion, he noted that individual members of Parliament can bring anything they choose to the Commons floor.

    "Every private member can table bills and motions in the House," Harper said. "Party leaders don't have any control over that.

    "This motion was deemed voteable by an all-party committee of the House. I think that's unfortunate. In my case I will be voting against the motion."

    Woodworth's motion, if passed, would set up a committee of MPs to review the Criminal Code section which says a fetus does not become a human being until birth is complete.

    The opposition parties rejected Harper's renewed assertion that he doesn't want to reopen the abortion question.

    "No question: this motion seeks to reopen the abortion debate, and that's completely unacceptable," said Niki Ashton, the New Democrat status of women critic.

    "As they attempted with other contentious issues, this Conservative government is once again using a backbench MP to further their agenda," added interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae.

    During a one-hour debate of his motion, Woodworth told the Commons that the current legal definition of a human being is "dishonest."

    "Here's what our 400-year-old definition of a human being says: a child becomes a human being when it has completely proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother," said Woodworth.

    "How many Canadians believe that?"

    Pro-choice advocates, however, consider Woodworth's motion the thin edge of a wedge to eventually make abortion illegal.

    "The motion is a vehicle for religious groups and the anti-choice movement to establish legal personhood for fetuses," warned Joyce Arthur, executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada.

    "If they succeed, they'll try to re-criminalize abortion next."


    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus


    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?