Tuesday June 18, 2013



MOST READ LOCAL STORIES

    No Stats

QUESTION OF THE WEEK

  • Would you buy deer meat if it was on the menu at a restaurant?
  • Yes
  • 30%
  • No
  • 69%
  • Not sure
  • 1%
  • Total Votes: 94



Home »  cpart

John Edwards' lawyers: $1M used to hide mistress wasn't campaign contribution


Cate Edwards walks with her father John Edwards into the federal courthouse in Greensboro, N.C., as the defense continues in John Edwards' campaign corruption trial Monday, May 14, 2012. (AP Photo/Bob Leverone)

GREENSBORO, N.C. - Lawyers for John Edwards opened their defence of the former U.S. presidential contender Monday, arguing that the nearly $1 million in secret payments from two wealthy donors to help hide his pregnant mistress as he sought the Democratic nomination in 2008 were not campaign contributions.

Edwards has pleaded not guilty to six criminal counts related to campaign finance violations. He is accused of masterminding the scheme.

Defence attorneys are attacking the foundation of the prosecution's argument that the money should be considered an illegal campaign contribution intended to influence the outcome of an election.

But even the federal government was split on that, the defence argued. The Federal Election Commission previously decided that the money was not a campaign contribution. The Department of Justice calls that decision irrelevant.

On Monday, Lora Haggard, who was in charge of campaign finance compliance for Edwards, testified that the money from heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon and campaign finance chairman Fred Baron has never been reported, because the FEC said it didn't need to be.

She also said Edwards was never involved in formulating, filling out or filing campaign finance reports that were sent to the FEC.

Prosecutors rested their case Thursday by playing a tape of a 2008 national television interview in which the Democrat repeatedly lied about his extramarital affair and denied fathering his mistress' baby.

A key question is whether Edwards will take the stand.

Before winning a U.S. Senate seat in 1998, Edwards made a fortune as a personal injury lawyer renowned for his ability to sway jurors. But his testimony would expose himself to a likely withering cross-examination.


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Grand Forks Gazette welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: Information and Other Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2011 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?