Tuesday May 21, 2013


subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





    Gunmen carry out first attack on NATO convoy in Pakistan since supply route reopened, 1 killed


    Pakistani truck drivers, chant prayer before breaking their fast, on the third day of the Muslim holy fasting month of Ramadan, in Lahore, Pakistan, Monday, July 23, 2012. Muslims from Morocco to Afghanistan are steeling themselves for the toughest Ramadan in more than three decades with no food or drink, not even a sip of water during the hottest time of the year. (AP Photo/K.M. Chaudary)

    PESHAWAR, Pakistan - Gunmen opened fire on a convoy carrying NATO troop supplies to Afghanistan on Tuesday, killing a driver in the first attack in Pakistan since Islamabad ended its seven-month blockade of the route, a government official said.

    No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, but the Pakistani Taliban had warned they would target the trucks after the government reopened the supply line earlier this month.

    Pakistan closed the route last November in retaliation for American airstrikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, an incident the U.S. said was a mistake but the Pakistani military claimed was deliberate. Islamabad finally reopened the supply line after the U.S. apologized for the deaths.

    Gunmen targeted the trucks as they were passing near a bazaar in the town of Jamrud in the Khyber tribal area, said Faraz Khan, a local government official. Jamrud is located very close to Torkham, one of the two crossings used to transport NATO supplies to Afghanistan.

    In addition to the driver who was killed, a second driver and his assistant were wounded, said Khan.

    Suspected militants have destroyed hundreds of trucks and killed dozens of people in attacks on NATO convoys over the past decade. But the U.S. military has said the attacks have not had a significant impact on the delivery of supplies to Afghanistan.

    The U.S. was keen to get the supply line through Pakistan reopened because during the closure it was forced to rely on a longer route into Afghanistan through Central Asia that cost an additional $100 million per month.

    Prior to the November attack, the U.S. and other NATO countries shipped about 30 per cent of their nonlethal supplies through Pakistan into southern Afghanistan.

    The route between Afghanistan and the southern Pakistani port of Karachi will become even more important as the U.S. and other NATO countries accelerate their withdrawal from Afghanistan. The U.S. plans to withdraw most of its combat troops by the end of 2014 and will have to transport tens of thousands of containers filled with equipment and supplies out of the country.

    The U.S. held off on apologizing for the deaths of the Pakistani soldiers for so long because the Obama administration was worried about criticism from Republicans in a presidential election year. Anger at Pakistan is high in Washington because of the country's alleged support for Taliban militants fighting U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

    One of the reasons Pakistan held off on reopening the route was the fear of domestic backlash in a country where anti-American sentiment is high. The conflict has severely damaged the already troubled relationship between the two countries.


    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus


    Advertising | About Us | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2013 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?