Wednesday April 16, 2014

subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    • What do you consider to be the 2013 Story of the Year?
    • B.C. election
    • 36%
    • TRU law school
    • 4%
    • Proposed Ajax mine
    • 43%
    • Jack Shippobotham death
    • 3%
    • Starving horses seized
    • 11%
    • Red Lake cold case
    • 3%
    • Total Votes: 1070





    Home »  News »  Business

    Wal-Mart appeals 'unreasonable' $1.2M award in ex-employee lawsuit

    TORONTO - Wal-Mart Canada says a jury verdict that awarded a former employee more than $1 million is "shockingly unreasonable."

    The company is asking the Court of Appeal for Ontario to dismiss the claims made by Meredith Boucher who used to work at a store in Windsor, Ontario or at least lower the amount Wal-Mart has to pay her.

    Boucher sued Wal-Mart and her former manager, Jason Pinnock, for intentional infliction of mental suffering and constructive dismissal, meaning she was asked to work in intolerable conditions.

    The trial heard that Pinnock was mentally abusive toward her and would criticize her in front of other staff, such as when he made her count a row of skids to prove she could count to 10 and that Wal-Mart didn't take action against him.

    The jury ordered Wal-Mart to pay her $1 million in punitive damages and $200,000 in aggravated damages, as well as awarding her $250,000 from Pinnock.

    Both Pinnock and Wal-Mart are appealing, with Wal-Mart suggesting the jury wasn't properly instructed and that a better informed jury wouldn't have come up with those amounts.

    Wal-Mart called the damage awards "wholly disproportionate and/or shockingly unreasonable."

    "The findings of the jury were a substantial wrong and/or a miscarriage of justice," Wal-Mart said in its notice of appeal.

    Boucher's lawyer, Myron Shulgan, said the jury's findings should be upheld.

    "This jury spoke as the voice and conscience of the community to express its view of Wal-Mart's conduct," he said in an interview from Windsor.

    "We're disappointed that Wal-Mart's chosen to dedicate its resources to pursue an appeal of this decision rather than making use of those resources to improve the environment and condition in which their employees are employed."


    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2014 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?