Thursday July 24, 2014

subscription options


Print Edition»

  • Includes free
    digital edition
  • Digital Edition»

  • Print format with
    enhanced features!
  • QUESTION OF THE WEEK

    • What do you consider to be the 2013 Story of the Year?
    • B.C. election
    • 36%
    • TRU law school
    • 4%
    • Proposed Ajax mine
    • 43%
    • Jack Shippobotham death
    • 3%
    • Starving horses seized
    • 11%
    • Red Lake cold case
    • 3%
    • Total Votes: 1070





    B.C. hints at improving childcare but advocates say complete plan is key

    VANCOUVER - British Columbia's government is promising to give province-wide childcare a boost, but the pledge comes hand-in-hand with the premier's criticism of another provincial daycare system that most closely resembles what advocates say is needed.

    One day after the throne speech hinted at new measures to come, Premier Christy Clark said that by charging parents a flat $7 fee per day, Quebec's daycare system is far too expensive.

    Lobbyists in B.C. have been campaigning for childcare at a rate of $10 per day.

    "I think many Quebecers are recognizing that it's unaffordable to provide daycare at the same rate universally to people who are very, very wealthy as to people who are not so wealthy," she told reporters in Victoria on Wednesday.

    But Clark went on to say childcare is an important issue for her and that more details of her government's upcoming plans will be revealed closer to the budget next Tuesday.

    Advocates like Emily Mlieczko, executive director of the Early Childhood Educators of B.C., said Clark's response was typical under a system where, in her view, children's early years already get short-shrift.

    "We understand that this will be a generational shift, that it will take time to implement a full plan," she said in an interview. "But we need a government to take the initiative to move forward and ... have a commitment to developing one."

    The campaign for one flat fee has garnered the support of several organizations and thousands of families, including 3,000 who signed postcards encouraging the government to take a closer look leading up to the province's first Family Day. The campaign also calls for free care for families making under $40,000 a year.

    But Mlieczko said the scheme has not made any headway with the Ministry of Children and Family Development and so she doesn't expect a reversal any time soon.

    The throne speech provided a vague outline of priorities, stating there will be additional measures to support families, such as by improving access and affordability of childcare.

    Paul Kershaw, lead facilitator with a group called Generation Squeeze, said he believes the flat-fee campaign has mounted enough pressure to at least get it on the discussion table.

    "I think the fact they (the government) have embraced the language of making life more affordable for families with young kids is because they are hearing there is a problem," he said.

    But he suggested the potential measures he's heard could be coming such as changes to the subsidy made available to people who qualify as "working poor" miss the point.

    "They're failing to see it's an entire generational issue. We need to win that in order for them to really embrace the policy recommendations that we're putting forward," he said.

    According to the B.C. Government and Service Employees' Union, annual childcare costs between $9,000 and $14,000 for a two year old, depending on the city. The union has said there is only one licensed daycare space for every five children.

    Childcare policy expert Martha Friendly, who runs the Childcare Resource and Research Unit in Toronto, said no province has the right formula yet.

    "No province has a plan, a policy framework of 'here's what we're trying to do, here's where we want to go, here's how long we're going to take, here's our targets and timetables, here's the best evidence,'" she said.

    Instead, B.C. and other provinces are operating a patchy system that has asked the commercial market to provide the answers.

    "It's like a dog's breakfast and it's kind of covered over with regulations ... and then some funding, which really doesn't do the trick," she said.

    Friendly said she personally doesn't believe the flat-fee system is best and instead would advocate for a sliding scale.

    But more important is that the government exerts political will to create a comprehensive plan in the first place, she said.


    Comments


    NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

    The Kamloops Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

    blog comments powered by Disqus



    Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2014 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

    LOG IN



    Lost your password?